Friday 11 April 2014

Cupid's Crosshairs

Today, we're stepping away from heroes and super-villains and taking a nice jaunt into the world of romance and Hallmark-style relationships.
There is much to be said about fiction. Sometimes, the relationships are so painfully real it's hard to read or hear. Sometimes, they're so cloyingly adorable and sweet that a trip to the dentist is required. And sometimes, they're just plain unrealistic. Sometimes, they create false standards. Sometimes, they just aren't healthy. 

Today's field trip into the land of tropes includes a visit to something I like to call "insta-love".

You know, the one where a female lead happens to be in some artsy-fartsy cafe and she looks up and sees her perfect man staring at her from across the room. Their eyes meet, fireworks explode, Cupid shoots and audiences everywhere "aww". 
I have two problems with this situation. One; artsy-fartsy cafes tend to smell funny and are as such strenuously avoided. Two; is the heroine a mind-reader? As far as I can tell, most of us aren't blessed with the ability to read someone on sight. Even Cal Lightman1, based on real-life Dr. Paul Ekman, isn't that good. 
Oh, Bella. Why, oh why?
Instant-attraction? Sure. Instant connection over the book they both happen to be reading? Sure. But insta-love? Maybe not. It's impossible to know the subtleties of character a person has without first talking to them. It's even harder to know if two people are compatible if the most interaction they've had is a shared glance.

There's a reason the "best-friends who fall in love" trope works - it's because at the very least, they've taken the time to actually to get to know one another. Sure, it's cliched and played out and usually involves griping about how "they'll never see you like I do", but at the very least, there can be a modicrum of reality.
That's not to say you, as the creator of the next great romance, can't have your characters share glances across a crowded room. They can be attracted to one another, and maybe even trade hopeful smiles. Just be cognisant that love isn't instant. It takes work and time. Don't force your characters into relationships just for the sake of having relationships.

Your characters should be flawed, imperfect and most of all, relatable. Not every relationship will end with two souls harmonizing. Some break and fall
apart. What appears lovely at first glance might turn out to be horrendous - don't limit yourself to happily-ever-afters.
Even your characters need to learn how to be alone and to deal with heartbreak - it's what allows them to be even more real.

And most of all; realize that Cupid doesn't always have the best aim.





1 Dr Cal Lightman is played by Tim Roth in the wonderful TV show "Lie to Me". Lightman plays a fictionalized version of Dr. Ekman, a man capable of reading micro-expressions. It's a solid piece of television, if you're looking for a new Netflix show to binge on. 


For an alternate perspective, feel free to check out 
http://www.amyplumbooks.com/2011/11/lets-talk-about-insta-love/ 

3 comments:

  1. Hi Siri! First I'd like to say that I really wasn't expecting your blog to be as interesting as it is! You managed to make me want to read about something I would never have cared about before! So thank you! As for this post I agree with you 100% when it comes to "insta-love". That's what I hate from those kinds of movies. I'm we've all looked up and met eyes with someone and felt some sort of connection because they were in fact looking back at us. However, I have yet to meet anyone who has taken such an encounter any farther... Keep up the captivating writing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful writing throughout this blog. Incredibly funny references and commentaries. I love how you explore these different tropes, rationalize them and give prospective writers a solid opinion about them. Keep up the good work.

    Watch out for little formatting glitches though. Ex. Can't read 'Christover Reeves', Grits pic is placed before grits is mentioned in the blog, and your #2 footnote is not present in this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. O Siri! Wonderful Siri! You have hit the nail on the head. How horribly taboo and utterly irrational love at first sight is. It is a nose-dive... a face-plant, rather, into a love story which could have been lead on in a far more interesting, and as you said, relate-able, way. I find the slow ascent from acquaintances to lovers is far more charming than: "Then, our eyes met. I had never seen such eyes before. I knew at that moment that I loved him. Every fiber of my being yearned for him. And, if only by the way there was a subtle flash of je-ne-sais-quoi in his gaze, I was sure he loved me too." It just doesn't work out like that.

    ReplyDelete